Wordless proofs

Andrés Arrieta pointed me to the following post on Google+.

(The experience of creating circles of interest and sharing posts with them is quite different from making friends on Facebook or joining mailing lists, groups on LinkedIn and other services, or anything else I have seen. Andrés is in my APL & J circle, which gives me the option to see his comments that he shares with one of his circles that includes me. His circles and mine do not have to correlate in any way in order for us to pass ideas around between circles that do not  overlap. I don’t even know which of Andrés’s circles he has put me in.)

Kimberly Lau  –  Jul 18, 2011  –  Public
I am befuddled. Looks neat, though.

96. 96. Can you give examples of proofs without words? In particular, can you give examples of proofs without words for non-trivial results? (One could ask if this is of interest to mathematicians, an…

[The illustration above demonstrates that

1+2+⋯+(n−1)=C(n, 2)

The left side is the number of yellow dots, each of which corresponds to exactly one selection of two dots from the bottom row of n dots. The question then is which children can work out that relationship just from the diagram, the equation, and the definition of the Combinations function C, with no other hints.]

I replied (reformatted with hyperlinks),

This is of interest to those creating lessons for the 2 million+ students in One Laptop Per Child/Sugar Labs programs in dozens of languages. The best-known such proof is of the Pythagorean theorem. There are two versions of this proof in animated GIFs [in Wikimedia]. We are using some others [in the Sugar Labs Turtle Art tutorials]. For example, it is easy to prove visually that the differences between successive square integers are odd integers, and similarly for many other relationships among Figurate Numbers.  [in progress.]

The technique of wordless proofs is essentially the same as that of Roy Doty’s Wordless Workshop series.

See also Proofs without Words: Exercises in Visual Thinking (Classroom Resource Materials) (Two volumes), by Roger B. Nelsen

Here is a visual proof for odd numbers adding up to square numbers. For example, when we put 5s around the square of side 4, we need 4 for each side, plus one in the corner.

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
8 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
8 7 6 6 6 6 6 6
8 7 6 5 5 5 5 5
8 7 6 5 4 4 4 4
8 7 6 5 4 3 3 3
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 2
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

One of the great things about visual proofs is that we can program them in Turtle Art, or Logo, or Smalltalk, or J, or Dr. Geo, or a variety of other tools, and we can challenge children to do it, or to invent other visual proofs. We can do some visual proofs in just text, as just above here.

For young children, visual definitions often work better than more abstract definitions in words. For example, the tangent line to a curve defines the direction of the curve at that point. Clear? Or is this better?

And can you tell what the iconic Turtle Art blocks do from the pictures? (The blank block is Clean, which blanks any previous drawing and puts the Turtle at its default starting place in the middle of the screen.)

With this definition, we can immediately prove visually that the direction of the curve at a maximum or minimum is level.

Level tangent at maximum

We will have many more of these.

Advertisements

About mokurai

Generalist; End poverty at a profit for all
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s